A few quick filters so the profiles you see match what you are actually choosing between.
These filters only shape the profiles you will be shown in this session. None of your answers are stored beyond this game session unless you opt in at the end.
One moment before your results
Tell us about yourself so we can show you how your worldview compares to others: once enough people have played. Skip any field. None of this is required.
Stored locally on your device only. When peer-comparison launches at the sample-size threshold, your tags will be hashed and aggregated: never shown individually.
A research preview by Sanctity AI
BasketSort
Forced-choice preference elicitation. Pick the better basket repeatedly, and the math behind it discovers what you actually value.
Sessions on this device0
How deep?
Active games 8Basket bundles and 1-vs-1 decisions
0
in sessionRound 1 / 30
Progress
exploring · priors
-
Option A-
VS
Option B-
Admin · Weight trace
Your archetype
-
-
Picks
0
In-sample fit
-
Top
-
Spread
-
Your ranking
95% credible intervals
Confidence tiers
iAdjacent ranks with overlapping CIs get grouped. The model is confident about which tier each item belongs to, less confident about the order within a tier.
grouped by overlapping CIs
Convergence over rounds
how your worldview took shape
Pairwise matchup matrix
iFor any two entries, predicted probability the row beats the column 1-on-1.
row beats column
Pivotal round
iThe single round whose pick shifted your inferred ranking the most.
biggest shift
Your profile: in words
auto-generated narrative
Why is one ranked above the other?
iPick any two entries to see direct evidence (rounds they appeared opposite each other), counter-evidence, and the weight gap.
unpacks the model's reasoning
vs
Decision quality
iDecisive (>80% predicted), borderline (40-60%), contradicted (<20%: you went against your own pattern).
how predictable your picks were
Information per round
iBits of evidence each round contributed. Tall bars = close calls that resolved uncertainty. Short bars = obvious picks.
evidence per round
Calibration
iFor groups of rounds the model predicted with similar confidence, what fraction did go that way. Diagonal = perfect calibration.
predicted vs actual
Time travel: replay your worldview round by round
iSlide through every round to see your inferred ranking at that exact point.
drag the slider
R1R30
Robustness
iHow many picks would need to flip before each adjacent pair swaps. Larger = more robust ranking.
picks-to-flip per gap
Logical inconsistencies Betai3-cycles (A>B>C>A) in your beats graph. Logically inconsistent picks, common in real human judgment.
cycles in your beats-graph
Bundle simulator
iToggle items into Side A and Side B to see which combination your model predicts would win, with confidence.
try any matchup
Tournament champion BetaiMonte Carlo 10,000 single-elimination tournaments using your inferred weights. Most-frequent champion.
10,000 bracket simulations
Bootstrap rank stability BetaiResample your picks with replacement 200 times, refit the model each time, and record the rank position each item lands at. Tells you which positions are confidently held vs interchangeable.
200 bootstrap refits
Cross-session drift BetaiIf you've played this game before, this compares your current ranking to your last session via Spearman rank correlation.