A public constitution for artificial intelligence

Written in public.
Open to change.

Eight Articles on how intelligent systems should treat people. Every line is written from public answers rather than by a committee, and every line says which question produced it.

Answer the 8 questions A few seconds each. No account, nothing published with your name on it.
How the Constitution is written
  1. One question per Article, four positions

    Each Article has a founding question with four positions, and "Not sure" for anyone who has not decided. A question tests one boundary of the Article, not all of it.

  2. Shares only when they mean something

    Below 20 positions an Article is still forming: we show counts, not percentages. Every share is of current participants who took a position, not of the world. "Not sure" is counted, but never as a position.

  3. Lines come after the evidence

    No line is written in advance. Once 20 people have taken a position on a question, the position most of them chose is proposed as the line, in its own words, and marked as not adopted. Only a person adopts it, in public, with its question named. Every line on this page names the question it came from.

  4. Then a layer deeper

    Once a founding question has 20 positions, a deeper question on the same Article can open. The first line says whether; the next ones ask on what terms. They are asked the same way, and every one is approved by a person before anyone sees it.

The full method ↗

Status
Draft
Articles
8
Clauses adopted
0
Proposed
0
As at
25 September 2026

Draft

A Constitution for Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence has no values of its own. It inherits ours. This document sets out what people say those values are, Article by Article. Nothing here is adopted until the question behind it has been answered by enough people, and every line names that question.

Article I

Dignity

Every person has inherent worth.

  1. From the question: Should AI decide who gets care first when there is not enough for everyone? 0 people have taken a position. Shares are shown from 20. Answer it yourself

Article II

Safety

Protection from serious harm.

  1. From the question: Should AI be able to stop you doing something it thinks is dangerous? 0 people have taken a position. Shares are shown from 20. Answer it yourself

Article III

Agency

Meaningful control over our own choices.

  1. From the question: Should AI tell you what it thinks you should do? 0 people have taken a position. Shares are shown from 20. Answer it yourself

Article IV

Privacy

Boundaries around ourselves and our lives.

  1. From the question: Should AI use what you gave it for one thing to help you with something else? 0 people have taken a position. Shares are shown from 20. Answer it yourself

Article V

Truth

Our relationship with reality and honest information.

  1. From the question: Should AI give you an answer when it is not sure it is right? 0 people have taken a position. Shares are shown from 20. Answer it yourself

Article VI

Fairness

How benefits, burdens and opportunities should be shared.

  1. From the question: When there is not enough to go round, should AI give extra weight to people who had a harder start? 0 people have taken a position. Shares are shown from 20. Answer it yourself

Article VII

Power

Who may make consequential decisions over others.

  1. From the question: When an AI decides something about you and you disagree, should its decision stand? 0 people have taken a position. Shares are shown from 20. Answer it yourself

Article VIII

Flourishing

The conditions for humans and society to thrive over time.

  1. From the question: Should AI accept a cost to people today for a gain to people in the future? 0 people have taken a position. Shares are shown from 20. Answer it yourself